| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs > Volume 32(3); 2025 > Article
Lee, Kang, and Park: Effects of Flipped Learning Utilizing Digital Literacy on Critical Thinking and Self-directed Learning in Nursing Students in Korea: A Quasi-experimental Study

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of flipped learning digital literacy on critical thinking and self-directed learning in nursing students in Korea.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group pre-test-post-test design was employed to examine the effects of flipped learning using digital literacy on critical thinking and self-directed learning in nursing students. The participants were third-year nursing students at B University in Korea. Flipped learning was administered to 36 students in the experimental group for 13 weeks, while traditional lecture-based instruction was provided to 35 students in the control group from September to December 2023. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 27.0. The independent t-test was conducted to compare effects between the experimental and control groups.

Results

The post-test scores for critical thinking showed differed between the experimental and control groups, however, it was not statistically significantly (t=-0.86, p=.391). However, the scores for self-directed learning showed a significant difference in favor of the experimental group (t=2.06, p=.042).

Conclusion

Flipped learning using digital literacy effectively enhances self-directed learning. However, critical thinking requires long-term follow-up to ensure that significant changes persist. This finding suggests that both short- and long-term effects should be considered when evaluating educational outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

In the rapidly changing social environment influenced by the recent COVID-19 pandemic and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, educational methods that utilize diverse content are emerging. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most universities in Korea and worldwide interacted with students through online education instead of in traditional classroom settings [1]. This shift in educational modalities persists even after the pandemic. Information and communications technology (ICT) classes based on technologies frequently used by the younger generations, such as mobile phones, tablet PCs, and social networking services, have become prevalent [2]. The ability to accept and utilize these ICTs is referred to as "digital literacy" [3]. In recent times, digital literacy, a crucial competency for acquiring knowledge and information in modern society, is actively incorporated into university education using digital media-based learning methods [4].
The advancement and expansion of digital health have improved the quality of diagnosis and treatment; this has led digital literacy to become an essential component of medical and healthcare education and services [5]. In the nursing field, digital literacy is indispensable for accurately interpreting and managing diverse patient information while performing evidence-based nursing practice [6]. This is because the rapidly evolving clinical environment driven by technological advancements demands high-level skills for information utilization. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing recommends incorporating nursing informatics into the nursing curriculum [7]. This reflects American nursing colleges' proactive response to current societal demands for nursing competencies. In Korea, nursing education actively incorporates online content for learning [1], explores various educational methods, and incorporates various platforms such as Zoom to achieve learning outcomes [8]. To train future healthcare professionals to adapt well to the new digital environment, it is necessary to employ educational methods that enable nursing students to leverage their digital literacy in acquiring nursing expertise [9]. Recently, various teaching methods such as team-based learning and case-based learning have been utilized, but attention should be paid to flipped learning, which is relatively easy to utilize through digital literacy, is more flexible than team-based learning (TBL), can promote self-directed learning by increasing immersion in learning content [10], and supports academic-centered learning activities by enhancing conceptual understanding compared to case-based learning (CBL) [11]. Against this backdrop, flipped learning has garnered attention as an effective instructional strategy among various digital media-based learning methods, particularly for promoting self-directed learning and increasing student engagement in the classroom [12,13]. Often referred to as "inverted learning," flipped learning enables learners to acquire foundational knowledge through online pre-class activities and then engage in deeper learning during in-class discussions and problem-solving exercises. This approach is characterized by a flexible learning environment, a shift toward a learner-centered culture, the use of active learning strategies, and the implementation of professional teaching techniques [12]. By utilizing digital tools during the preparatory phase and encouraging active student participation during class, flipped learning facilitates the transition from teacher-centered to learner-centered instruction [12]. In this study, digital literacy was employed from the initial stages of instruction to maximize the effectiveness of flipped learning. Rather than simply using digital tools, digital literacy was conceptualized as a core individual competency that enhances learning outcomes. Digital literacy, in particular, is regarded as a concept that encompasses three sub-skills: the technical ability to search for and utilize digital content, the cognitive ability to evaluate and structure information, and the socioemotional ability to communicate and act ethically in online environments. These elements are essential to enhancing the effectiveness of flipped learning in nursing education. Moreover, while previous studies on flipped learning primarily relied on instructor-provided content [13-18], this study is distinguished by incorporating a pre-class learning process in which students independently search for and select digital resources. This change not only allowed students to apply their digital literacy but also offered a structurally different approach. Therefore, the "flipped learning utilizing digital literacy" in this study extends beyond the application of digital tools, representing a comprehensive instructional design that integrates learners' digital competencies throughout the learning process.
In nursing education, critical thinking and self-directed learning ability are essential competencies for enhancing problem-solving skills and professional growth in clinical settings [18]. Critical thinking is defined as a cognitive process in which learners make informed decisions and solve problems in complex situations [19], serving as a cornerstone of clinical judgment and evidence-based nursing practice [20]. Self-directed learning refers to an autonomous learning process in which learners set their own goals, select strategies, and evaluate outcomes [21], forming the foundation for continuous professional development and lifelong learning in rapidly changing clinical environments [22]. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21) also identifies critical thinking as one of the core competencies for future professionals [23], underscoring the importance of educational strategies that foster these abilities in nursing students. Previous studies have shown that flipped learning positively impacts students' critical thinking and self-directed learning abilities, primarily through online pre-class learning and active in-class interaction [18]. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of flipped learning, with an emphasis on digital literacy, on these two core competencies in nursing students. Previous studies that examined the effects of flipped learning on critical thinking and self-directed learning mostly involved lower-year nursing students and were conducted as single-group experimental studies, only assessing the pre- and post-effects of education [13-17]. The duration of these studies varied from 3 to 7 weeks; however, the intervention periods were relatively short, limiting the ability to attribute the observed effects solely to the flipped learning method. Additionally, these studies did not consider the digital competencies of the students. In Korea, lower-year nursing students (freshmen and sophomores) typically study foundational subjects necessary for their major, while third-year students and above engage in clinical practice and begin to study major subjects in greater depth. Effective learning of these major subjects is crucial for enhancing nursing competencies post-graduation, highlighting the need for various approaches to improve learning outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the level of digital literacy among third-year nursing students and to verify the effects of flipped learning, utilizing digital literacy, on critical thinking and self-directed learning. The study's hypotheses are as follows:
  • The experimental group will have higher critical thinking-scores than the control group.

  • The experimental group will have higher self-directed learning scores than the control group.

METHODS

1. Study Design

This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group pretest-post-test design to examine the effects of flipped learning methods utilizing digital literacy on the critical thinking and self-directed learning of nursing students.

2. Participants

Third-year nursing students enrolled in an adult nursing course at B University located in Busan Metropolitan City participated in this study. Students who were on a leave of absence, planning to withdraw, or had more than two absences were excluded from the study. The sample size for this study was determined through an a priori power analysis using G*Power 3.1.9.4. Referring to a previous study [13], an effect size of .70, a significance level of .05, and a statistical power of .80 were assumed for a two-tailed independent t-test. This analysis indicated that 34 participants per group were required. Allowing for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 10%, the target sample size was set at 38 participants per group (total=76). Ultimately, 75 students were recruited, with 38 in the experimental group and 37 in the control group. Following the withdrawal of two participants from each group, the final sample included in the analysis comprised 71 students.

3. Data Collection Tools

The tools used in this study included questionnaires on the general and learning-related characteristics (including digital literacy) of the participants, and on their critical thinking and self-directed learning abilities. Instruments for measuring digital literacy, critical thinking, and self-directed learning were used with permission from their respective developers.

1) General characteristics and learning-related charac-teristics

The general characteristics of the participants were assessed using two items: age and gender. Learning-related characteristics included three items-GPA of the previous semester, voluntary selection of the nursing major, and satisfaction with the major-along with 17 items on digital literacy, totaling 20 items. Digital literacy was measured using the Digital Literacy Toward ICT for Learning tool [3], which was translated and standardized into Korean by Kim [24]. This tool consists of 17 items across four domains: attitudes toward online learning, technical digital literacy skills, cognitive skills, and socioemotional skills. All items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with a total score ranging from 17 to 85. Higher scores indicated a more positive attitude towards online learning and higher digital literacy. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach's ⍺) of the original tool were .86 for the online learning attitude domain and .89 for the three domains related to digital literacy. The reliability coefficients of the Korean version were .81 for online learning attitudes and .84 for digital literacy. In this study, the reliability coefficients were .90 for online learning attitudes and .92 for digital literacy.

2) Critical thinking

Critical thinking was measured using a tool developed by Kwon et al.[19] to assess the critical thinking disposition of nursing students. This tool includes 35 items across eight domains: creativity, challenge, openness, prudence, objectivity, truth-seeking, inquisitiveness, and analytical skills. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with a total score ranging from 35 to 175. Higher scores indicate higher critical thinking. The Cronbach's ⍺ of the original tool ranged from .56 to .83 for individual factors and was .89 for the scale used in this study. In this study, the reliability coefficients for the individual factors ranged from .60 to .81, and the overall reliability coefficient was .73.

3) Self-directed learning

Self-directed learning was assessed using the SH-Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SH-SRSSDL) developed by Williamson [25] for nursing students; it was translated and standardized for Korean contexts by Jo et al.[26]. This tool comprises 30 items across five domains: awareness, learning strategies, learning activities, evaluation, and interpersonal skills; each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree), with a total score ranging from 30 to 150. Higher scores indicate greater self-directed learning. Williamson's original tool demonstrated reliability coefficients (Cronbach's ⍺) of .79 for awareness, .73 for learning strategies, and .71 each for learning activities, evaluation, and interpersonal skills. The Korean version showed reliability coefficients of .90 for awareness, .92 for learning strategies, .93 for learning activities, and .94 for evaluation and interpersonal skills. In this study, the reliability coefficients were .67 for awareness, .73 for learning strategies, .72 for learning activities, .61 for evaluation, .78 for interpersonal skills, and .88 for the entire scale.

4. Education Method and Data Collection

This study applied flipped learning in an adult nursing course for a period of 13 weeks: from September 1 to December 12, 2023 (excluding midterm and final exams). Prior to course registration, it was clearly announced through the department bulletin board, online community, and course syllabus that the class would be divided into two sections: one utilizing flipped learning and the other following a traditional lecture format. Students were allowed to register for the section of their choice. There was a potential for selection bias, as students voluntarily chose their class sections. To minimize this risk, a preliminary homogeneity test was conducted on the general characteristics and key variables between the experimental and control groups. Furthermore, both groups were taught by the same instructor, and the lecture content and weekly topics were similarly structured to reduce the influence of external factors. To implement flipped learning using digital literacy, students were instructed to search for, and upload one video related to the weekly topic one week prior to class. Students were assigned a specific disease topic for video searches, with each group focusing on a subtopic such as symptoms, diagnostic methods, medications, or treatments. The selected videos were uploaded to the LMS and reviewed by the instructor. Among the submitted videos, the instructor selected three to four based on relevance to the week's disease topic, video duration, and the credibility of the producing organization. The selected videos were compiled into a set with a total viewing time of approximately 20 minutes in order to maintain student focus and prevent fatigue from prolonged viewing. The video content covered symptoms, diagnostic methods, medications, and interventions related to the disease topic of the week. Only videos produced by reputable organizations, such as the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), and major university hospitals, were used. The curated video content was provided exclusively to the experimental group through the learning management system (LMS) to review prior to class. During class, students in the experimental group completed quizzes related to the pre-provided videos, participated in textbook- and video-based discussions in groups of seven to eight members, and received additional explanations from the instructor on the content not covered in the videos. The control group received traditional lecture-based instruction. The same video content provided to the experimental group was shown at the end of each session for the control group and then uploaded to the LMS Related quizzes and discussions were conducted in the following class session.

5. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS/WIN 27.0. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were used to analyze the general and learning-related characteristics of the participants. Homogeneity tests of the participants' characteristics and dependent variables between the experimental and control groups were conducted using independent t-tests and chi-squared tests.

6. Ethical Consideration

Prior to study commencement, approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Pusan National University from which the researcher belongs (IRB No. PNU IRB/2023_118_HR). To ensure the ethical protection of study participants, information about the study was provided prior to course registration. Only students who voluntarily agreed to participate were asked to sign a written consent form and guided to enroll in the section utilizing flipped learning. The course was conducted using two instructional formats-flipped learning and traditional lecture-while all other aspects of the curriculum and assessments remained identical. It was explained that there would be no disadvantages based on the choice of instructional method, and students were allowed to select their preferred format voluntarily. Grades and academic credits were assigned based on relative evaluation within each group; therefore, participation in the study had no impact on students' academic performance or grades. Additionally, to align with flipped learning characteristics, the content provided to the experimental group before class was made available to the control group after class.

RESULTS

1. General Characteristics, Learning-Related Characteristics, and Homogeneity Test of Variables

This study included 71 participants: 36 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group. In the experimental and control groups, 83.4% and 91.4% of the participants, respectively, were women. Most participants were in their 20s (86.1% in the experimental group and 88.5% in the control group). Regarding learning-related characteristics, 80.6% of the experimental group and 85.7% of the control group had a GPA of 3.1 to 4.0 in the previous semester. Voluntary selection of nursing majors was reported by 94.4% and 82.9% of the experimental and control groups, respectively. Satisfaction with their majors was reported by 63.9% and 71.4% of the experimental and control groups, respectively. The average score for digital literacy was 3.81±0.67 out of 5 in the experimental group and 3.80±0.67 in the control group. The homogeneity test results indicate that the two groups were homogeneous across all items (Table 1).
Table 1.
Homogeneity of General Characteristics, Learning-related Characteristics, and Dependent Variables between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=71)
Characteristics Categories Exp. (n=36) Cont. (n=35) x2 or t p
n (%) or M± SD n (%) or M± SD
Gender Men 6 (16.6) 3 (8.6) 1.21 .478
Women 30 (83.4) 32 (91.4)
Age 20∼29 31 (86.1) 31 (88.5) 0.46 1.000
≥30 5 (13.9) 4 (11.5)
Average grade 2.1∼3.0 4 (11.1) 5 (14.3) 3.36 .354
3.1∼4.0 29 (80.6) 30 (85.7)
≥4.1 3 (8.3) 0 (0.0)
Voluntary selection of major Yes 34 (94.4) 29 (82.9) 2.54 .151
No 2 (5.6) 6 (17.1)
Major satisfaction Bad 1 (2.8) 2 (5.7) 6.29 .565
Moderate 12 (33.3) 8 (22.9)
Good 23 (63.9) 25 (71.4)
Digital literacy 3.81±0.67 3.80±0.67 0.06 .956
Critical thinking disposition 121.08±13.22 122.03±12.47 -0.31 .758
Self-directed learning 106.83±14.05 107.94±12.53 -0.35 .727

Cont.=control group; Exp.=experimental group;

Fisher's exact test.

2. Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis 1: The first hypothesis, "The experimental group will have higher critical thinking scores than the control group", was tested. The critical thinking scores of the experimental group increased from a pretest score of 121.08±13.22 to a post-test score of 123.57±14.47 (overall increase: 2.49±1.25 points). Conversely, the control group's scores decreased from a pretest score of 122.03±12.47 to a post-test score of 120.83±12.57 (overall decrease: 1.2±0.10 points). While a difference in the post-test critical thinking scores between both groups was observed, it was not statistically significant (t=-0.86, p=.391), leading to the rejection of Hypothesis 1 (Table 2). Examining the subdomains of critical thinking, a significant difference was found in the "Truth-seeking" sub-domain in the experimental group pre-and post-intervention (t=-2.33, p=.023) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Differences in Dependent Variables between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=71)
Variables Pretest Posttest Difference t p
M± SD M± SD M± SD
Critical thinking Cont. (n=35) 122.03±12.47 120.83±12.57 -1.2±0.10 -0.86 .391
Exp. (n=36) 121.08±13.22 123.57±14.47 2.49±1.25
  Intellectual 3.91±0.53 4.07±0.49 0.16±0.04 -1.32 .191
  Creativity 3.28±0.92 3.05±1.03 -0.23±0.11 1.02 .312
  Challenge 2.25±0.65 2.44±0.64 0.19±0.17 -1.29 .199
  Open-mind 3.68±0.81 3.93±0.66 0.25±0.15 -1.49 .142
  Prudence 3.56±0.64 3.38±0.51 -0.18±0.13 1.35 .181
  Objectivity 3.60±0.50 3.66±0.55 0.06±0.05 -0.48 .631
  Truth-seeking 3.57±0.75 3.93±0.54 0.36±0.21 -2.33 .023
  Inquisitiveness 3.43±0.80 3.42±0.82 0.01±0.02 0.06 .956
Self-directed learning Cont. (n=35) 107.94±12.53 105.89±13.87 2.05±1.34 2.06 .042
Exp. (n=36) 106.83±14.05 113.57±13.01 6.74±1.04
  Awareness 3.71±0.59 3.80±0.56 0.09±0.03 -0.63 .531
  Learning strategies 3.54±0.72 3.96±0.54 0.42±0.18 -2.83 .006
  Learning activities 2.77±0.78 3.15±0.69 0.38±0.09 -2.17 .034
  Evaluation 3.39±0.59 3.69±0.56 0.30±0.03 -2.19 .032
  Interpersonal skills 3.99±0.60 4.11±0.50 0.12±0.10 -0.93 .357

Cont.=control group; Exp.=experimental group.

Hypothesis 2: On testing the second hypothesis, it was found that self-directed learning scores of the experimental group increased from a pretest score of 106.83±14.05 to a post-test score of 113.57±13.01 (overall increase: 6.74± 1.04 points). Conversely, the control group's scores decreased from a pretest score of 107.94±12.53 to a post-test score of 105.89±13.87 (overall decrease: 2.05±1.34 points). Self-directed learning scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (t=2.06, p=.042), thus supporting Hypothesis 2 (Table 2).
An analysis of the subdomains of self-directed learning in the experimental group revealed that the most notable improvement was in learning strategies, with a 0.42±0.18 -point increase (p=.006). Statistically significant improvements were also observed in learning activities (p=.034) and evaluation (p=.032). In contrast, although there were slight increases in awareness (0.09±0.03 points, p=.531) and interpersonal skills (0.12±0.10 points, p=.357), these changes were not statistically significant (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study examined the impact of digital literacy-based flipped learning methods on the critical thinking and self-directed learning abilities of Korean nursing students. The participants' average digital literacy score was 3.80∼3.81. This score was interpreted as relatively high, based on previous studies that reported similar levels and evaluated them as high among Korean [24] and Turkish [27] nursing students using comparable measurement tools. Similarly, prior research involving Turkish healthcare students, including nursing students, reported high digital literacy, similar to our study results [28]. Studies by Kim and Park [2,9], Kim [5], and Yoon [29] using various tools also reported high digital literacy among nursing students in South Korea. Internationally, high digital literacy has been reported among nursing students in Turkey [27], Australia [30], and the UAE [31]. Martzoukou's study found that nursing students indicated that younger students and freshmen had higher digital literacy than older and senior students [32]. Thus, it can be inferred that nursing students globally have high digital literacy capabilities. Consequently, it is essential for future nurses to continuously develop their ability to use evolving digital health technologies. Additionally, despite the variability in the number of items and the use of a 5-point Likert scale across different tools (Kim [2]; Kim [4]; Park [9]; Erdat et al.[27]; Yoon [29]; Lokmic-Tomkms [30]), the differences in tools did not affect the study outcomes. Unlike previous studies [13-18] that provided learning materials before class to encourage student participation, the intervention in this study-"flipped learning utilizing digital literacy" sought to differentiate itself by requiring students to search for learning materials independently using digital literacy skills. This change was intended to reflect a key feature of flipped learning, which enables students to construct knowledge more effectively by learning independently in any environment through complex and diverse learning activities and by providing richer opportunities for learning [12]. Our study findings did not support the first hypothesis, "The experimental group will have higher critical thinking scores than the control group," although there was some improvement in the experimental group's critical thinking. In contrast, a decrease in critical thinking scores was observed in the control group. These findings differ from those of previous studies that reported significant improvements in nursing students' critical thinking through flipped learning interventions [13-18]. Notably, while earlier studies implemented flipped learning for limited durations-four sessions over eight weeks [17], six weeks [14], ten weeks [15], and five sessions over 15 weeks [13,16]-this study applied flipped learning consistently over a full 13 week period, which is relatively uncommon. A previous meta-analysis of flipped learning [33] reported the largest effect sizes in interventions lasting seven to eight weeks. Compared to short-term interventions, continuous exposure to flipped learning may have led to cognitive fatigue, reduced concentration, or diminished intrinsic motivation. Additionally, during the flipped learning sessions in this study, students participated in group discussions composed of seven-eight members, which contrasts with previous studies that used smaller groups of two [15], four-five [13], or six [18] members. To maximize the effects of flipped learning, active interaction and the expression of individual opinions are essential [12], and thus, setting an appropriate group size is critical. The relatively large group size in this study may have limited individual participation opportunities or caused some students to adopt more passive roles. Indeed, small group settings have been reported to facilitate more active participation and feedback in flipped learning environments [34]. This increased participation suggests that the impact on critical thinking skills may vary depending on how the instructor designs the components of the class. Meanwhile, the decrease in critical thinking scores in the control group may suggest that traditional lecture-based instruction fails to stimulate learners' critical thinking adequately or that an emphasis on test-oriented, fragmented knowledge acquisition could hinder flexible thinking. Critical thinking is a high-level cognitive skill that is difficult to enhance through short-term instructional methods alone. It is influenced not only by teaching strategies but also by learners' cognitive engagement, interaction, the quality of feedback, and the complexity of tasks [19]. Therefore, in an era of information and diverse values, it is essential to develop educational programs that foster the habits and attitudes associated with critical thinking, which are vital for future nurses. The study findings supported the second hypothesis, "The experimental group will have higher self-directed learning scores than the control group". This aligns with the findings of Yang et al. [16], Kim [17], and Fan et al. [35], who reported improved self-directed learning abilities in nursing students through flipped learning. Flipped learning is not merely about providing pre-class content and delivering lectures in a one-way format; rather, it involves reviewing the content during class and engaging students through activities such as quizzes, questions, and discussions. In doing so, it encourages students to proactively study the content before class, thereby fostering self-directed learning. In this context, flipped learning can be regarded as an instructional method that enhances self-directed learning. Among the subdomains of self-directed learning, significant improvements were observed in learning strategies, learning activities, and evaluation. This improvement can be attributed to the structure of the flipped learning approach, which encouraged students to actively engage in class by searching for materials in advance and participating in quizzes and discussions. In contrast, the lack of significant changes in awareness and interpersonal skills might be explained by the relatively large group size used in this study, which may have limited deeper interaction among students, as previously discussed. Meanwhile, the control group showed a tendency for a decline in self-directed learning ability. This result can be interpreted as learners becoming accustomed to passively receiving information in traditional lecture-based classes, limiting their opportunities to plan or regulate their learning. Additionally, repetitive one-way delivery methods may reduce learning motivation, thereby weakening self-directed learning attitudes [18]. Therefore, further research is needed on the development of up-to-date clinical case-based content and various teaching methods to promote active participation among nursing students. This study is significant because it applied flipped learning using digital literacy to a core nursing theory course for third-year nursing students in South Korea, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing self-directed learning and the positive correlations between digital literacy and learning-related variables. This study did not differentiate between interventions based on individual digital literacy levels and only confirmed homogeneity between the experimental and control groups. Given the impact of digital literacy on self-directed learning, future research should explore interventions tailored to different levels of digital literacy. In addition, although the pre-learning videos were made available only through the LMS of the experimental group, there is a possibility that the experimental treatment may have unintentionally spread to the control group. As this could have influenced the study results, future studies should incorporate design considerations to block or control information sharing between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study applied a flipped learning approach in which students used digital literacy to engage in pre-online class learning and actively participate in class, rather than solely delivering content in a traditional lecture format. The study findings demonstrated that the flipped learning method was more effective than the conventional lecture format in enhancing self-directed learning. However, the findings also highlighted that critical thinking is not easily altered in the short term and require long-term observation and development. Furthermore, when selecting educational delivery methods and evaluating their effectiveness, it is important to consider both short-term effects, such as knowledge improvement, and long-term effects such as critical thinking enhancement. This approach ensured a comprehensive evaluation of educational interventions based on learners' digital literacy levels. Flipped learning utilizing digital literacy is expected to help nursing students adapt well to rapidly changing learning environments and improve learning-related competencies that will likely lead to improved patient care quality.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
AUTHORSHIP
Study conception and design acquisition - Lee M, Park S-B and Kang I; Data collection - Lee M; Data analysis & Interpretation - Lee M and Park S-B; Drafting & Revision of the manuscript - Lee M, Park S-B and Kang I.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Please contact the corresponding author for data availability.

REFERENCES

1. Kim KM. The effect of the replacement of online lecture on the motivation, attitude and online class satisfaction of university students by COVID-19. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2022; 22(1):329-339. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.1.329
crossref
2. Kim HW. The digital literacy, awareness, and educational needs of virtual reality among nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2023; 29(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2023.29.1.17
crossref
3. Ng W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education. 2012; 59(3):1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
crossref
4. Kim EJ. A study on the relationship between digital literacy and major satisfaction of nursing students: Intermediary role of LMS learning effects. Journal of Convergence Culture Technology. 2022; 8(4):27-35.

5. Dunn P, Hazzard E. Technology approaches to digital health literacy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019; 293(1):224-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.039
crossref pmid
6. Bergren MD, Maughan ED. Data and information literacy: a fundamental nursing competency. NASN School Nurse. 2020; 35(3):140-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X20913249
crossref pmid
7. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, District of Columbia: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2008.

8. Park JY. The effect of self-directed learning strategies on e-learning pre-learning of nursing students: focusing on the flow experience. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental Nursing. 2020; 27(1):52-63. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.1.52
crossref
9. Park KM. A study on the digital literacy of nursing students. Journal of Industrial Convergence. 2023; 21(8):111-117. https://doi.org/10.22678/JIC.2023.21.8.111
crossref
10. Umar S, Zia A, Khalid M, Rana FM, Jabbar S. Comparison of team-based and flipped classroom learning on academic achievements of physical therapy students. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022; 16(11):18-20. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2022161118
crossref
11. Kumar T, Sakshi P, Kumar C. Comparative study between case-based learning and flipped classroom for teaching clinical and applied aspects of physiology in competency-based UG curriculum. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2022; 11(10):6334-6338. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_172_22
crossref pmid pmc
12. Flipped Learning Network. Flipped Learning Network [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1. [cited 2025 Mar 19]. Available from: https://flippedlearning.org

13. Lee MH, Park MS. The effect of case-based learning based on flipped learning for nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2021; 27(2):107-116. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.2.107
crossref
14. Oak JW. Effects of flipped-learning teaching-learning model for the competencies enhancement on fundamental nursing practice. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 2022; 9(4):113-121.
crossref
15. Kim HS. The effect of fundamental nursing practice class with flipped learning on self-efficacy and critical thinking disposition of nursing students. Journal of Convergence Culture Technology. 2021; 7(3):277-284. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2021.7.3.277
crossref
16. Yang JW. The effect of flip learning method on self-directed learning ability, critical thinking disposition, and academic self-efficacy of nursing students. Journal of Korea Convergence Society. 2021; 12(11):467-473. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2021.12.11.467
crossref
17. Kim YS. Effect of flip learning-based community nursing education on learning motivation, learning-related self-direction, self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, problem-solving ability, and learning satisfaction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2023; 23(4):311-324.
crossref
18. Erden D, Kaya H. The online flipped learning model: Effects on academic achievement, critical thinking, and self-directed learning skills in nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Research. 2025; 33(2):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000669
crossref pmid
19. Kwon IS, Lee GE, Kim GD, Kim YH, Park KM, Park HS, et al. Development of a critical thinking disposition scale for nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006; 36(6):950-958. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.6.950
crossref pmid
20. Heo HJ. Effects of nursing students' self-initiated learning, tendency of critical thinking and clinical decision making ability on their clinical competence. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21. 2022; 13(2):675-688. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.13.2.48
crossref
21. Slusarski SB. Enhancing self-direction in the adult learner: instructional techniques for teachers and trainers. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 1994; 1994(64):71-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946411
crossref
22. Chu MS. The relationship between communication, problem solving, self-directed learning and nursing process confidence of nursing students before graduation. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2022; 23(4):387-397. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.4.387
crossref
23. Battelle for Kids. P21 resources [Internet]. Columbus (OH): Battelle for Kids; 2024 Jan 15. [cited 2025 Mar 19]. Available from: https://www.battelleforkids.org/insights/p21-resources

24. Kim SS, Jeon JH. Factors influencing eHealth literacy among Korean nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2020; 22(3):667-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12711
crossref pmid
25. Williamson SN. Development of a self-rating scale for self-directed learning. Nurse Researcher. 2007; 14(2):66-83. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.66.c6022
crossref pmid
26. Jo HY, Choi MS, Yi HY. A validation study of the Korean self-rating scale of self-directed learning performance indicator for learners: focusing on S university students. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2021; 21(1):289-310.
crossref
27. Erdat Y, Sezer Ceren RE, Ozdemir L, Uslu-Sahan F, Bilgin A. Influence of technical, cognitive and socioemotional factors on digital literacy in nursing students assessed using structural equation modeling. Nurse Education Today. 2023; 130(1):105937.
crossref pmid
28. Aydınlar A, Mavi A, Kütükçü E, Kırımlı EE, Alış D, Akın A, et al. Awareness and level of digital literacy among students receiving health-based education. BMC Medical Education. 2024; 24(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05025-w
crossref pmid pmc
29. Yoon SJ. The effect of nursing students' digital literacy ability on learning presence and learning satisfaction in online classes. Journal of Next-Generation Convergence Technology Association. 2022; 6(12):2400-2412. https://doi.org/10.33097/JNCTA.2022.06.12.2400
crossref
30. Lokmic-Tomkins Z, Choo D, Foley P, Dix S, Wong P, Brand G. Pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of their baseline digital literacy and what it means for education: a prospective cohort survey study. Nurse Education Today. 2022; 111(1):105308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105308
crossref pmid
31. Ibrahim RK, Aldawsari AN. Relationship between digital capabilities and academic performance: the mediating effect of self-efficacy. BMC Nursing. 2023; 22(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01593-2
crossref pmid pmc
32. Martzoukou K, Luders ES, Mair J, Kostagiolas P, Johnson N, Work F, et al. A cross-sectional study of discipline-based self-perceived digital literacy competencies of nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2024; 80(2):656-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15801
crossref pmid
33. Cho BR, Lee JM. A meta analysis on effects of flipped learning in Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2018; 16(3):59-73. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.059
crossref
34. Ng EKL. Student engagement in flipped classroom in nursing education: an integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice. 2023; 68: 103585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103585
crossref pmid
35. Fan JY, Tseng YJ, Chao LF, Chen SL, Jane SW. Learning outcomes of a flipped classroom teaching approach in an adult-health nursing course: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education. 2020; 20(1):317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02240-z
crossref pmid pmc